French First Lady Brigitte Macron 72 Present Evidence in Court That Proves She’s a Woman , French president Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron are about to provide scientific and photographic evidence in a U.S court in order to dispel various defamatory remarks that Brigitte was, in fact, born as a male. American conservative commentator Candace Owens spread these allegations, stating that Brigitte had been named Jean-Michel Trogneux- the name of her elder brother- in the first place.
The Macrons sued Owens on 218 pages as a punitive damages, trial by jury action in July 2025 in Delaware. The attorney general believes their experts in the field of science will present expert witness accounts and personal photographs of Brigitte when pregnant and raising her children to show that the charges are false. According to Macrons, Owens released fake information on purpose and knew that it was false, yet it was proven by credible evidence otherwise.
Owens has argued that her actions are covered by the First Amendment of protected free speech and has moved to dismiss the case on the grounds of jurisdiction. Through her podcast series, she is still spreading the conspiracy theory in her podcast series, which is called Becoming Brigitte. These claims have had a considerable reputation and emotional damage, which is why the Macrons are suing.
The legal department of Macrons is keen to point out that it is not an issue of censorship, but rather the preservation of their image and fighting against negative fake news.
Backstory
- False Allegations:
o The American commentator Candace Owens circulated the allegations about the fact that Brigitte Macron was a male born and her real name was Jean-Michel Trogneux.
o In fact, the real name of Jean-Michel Trogneux is that of an older brother of Brigitte and the statement therefore cannot be proved true.
- Prior French Legal Cases:
o In France, two people were found guilty of defaming Brigitte Macron by publishing similar statements earlier.
o Nevertheless, in July 2025, these convictions were reversed by the Paris Court of Appeal, based on the freedom of expression.
o This ruling is being appealed to the top court of France and therefore the controversy continues.
- Impact on the Macrons:
o The accusations have led to emotional trauma and tarnishing of the reputation by Brigitte and President Macron.
o They consider the deceit-laden claims to be a form of political and personal defamation.
U.S. Lawsuit and Procedure
- Filing the Lawsuit:
o In July 2025, the Macrons sued Candace Owens in Delaware, United States, with a defamation suit consisting of 218 pages.
o The suit is punitive damages and is demanding a jury trial.
- Claims and Evidence:
o It is alleged by the Macrons that Owens was conscious to disseminate fake news to benefit himself.
o They intend to provide scientific and photographic data to prove the gender of Brigitte, such as:
• Personal photos of Brigitte with her children.
•Qualifications of medical and scientific specialists.
•outlined history of Brigitte and her family.
- Owens’ Defense:
o Owens defends her assertions claiming that her statements are under the protection of free speech under the first amendment.
o She has made a motion to dismiss the case on the grounds of jurisdiction.
o Owens advances her theory as she still maintains her podcast, Becoming Brigitte.
- Next Steps:
o The Macrons are getting ready to give evidence in court.
o The court of U.S. will conclude whether the claims made by Owens are defamation or covered by free speech.
o It is likely that the case would deal with expert testimony, records, and eyewitness testimony.
Timeline of Events
Before 2025 – Origins of the Rumor
- Date Unknown: There are also conspiracy theories spread on the Internet, suggesting that Brigitte Macron was born a man, calling her Jean-Michel Trogneux.
- Fact Check: Jean-Michel Trogneux is in fact the elder brother of Brigitte Macron and therefore the rumours prove to be false.
Early 2025 – French Legal Action
- First Convictions: Two people are convicted in France over defamation of Brigitte Macron by spreading such false statements.
- Appeal: In July 2025, the Paris Court of Appeal reverses these convictions, referring to the freedom of expression.
- Further Appeal: The case is currently under review at the highest court in France that leaves the legal issue open in France.
July 2025 – U.S. Lawsuit Filed
- 218-Page Complaint: Brigitte Macron and President Emmanuel Macron bring a defamation suit against Candace Owens in Delaware, the U.S.
- Claims: The Macrons claim that Owens disseminated false information knowing about the consequence on personal gain and resulting in reputational and emotional damages.
- Law Staff: Attorney Tom Clare and a group of scientific and legal professionals deal with the case.
August-September 2025 -preparation of evidence.
- Photographic Evidence: Brigitte, through her team, collects personal photographs, among them, the photos of her pregnancy, and up-bringing of her children.
- Scientific Evidence: Specialists come up with reports to verify the gender of Brigitte Macron.
- Strategy: The Macrons also remind people that the suit has nothing to do with censorship but solely honor and reputation.
September 2025 – Owens’ Defense
- Free Speech Claim: Candace Owens claims that her assertions are covered by the First Amendment.
- Motion to Dismiss: Owens submits a motion to dismiss and challenges the court of Delaware to have jurisdiction over the case.
- Constant Promotion: Owens carries on with the assertion on her podcast, Becoming Brigitte.
Upcoming Steps
- Presentation in court: Macrons are to provide scientific, photographic, and personal evidence in the U.S. court.
- Expert Testimony: Medical and historical experts can testify to disapprove the charges on Owens.
- Jury Trial: In case the motion to dismiss by Owens is denied, the case will be subjected to a jury trial.
- Result: The American court will give its ruling on whether the assertions of Owens amount to defamation or a free speech.
Conclusion
The Brigitte Macron case on defamation highlights the issue of misinformation and reputation across the globe in the digital age. The misrepresentations of her gender, which Candace Owens has spread, have had emotional and reputation damage, which is why the Macrons have resorted to legal action in France and the U.S.. Although the French courts found guilty of defamation an initial number of people, their conviction was reversed citing free speech.
The American case is a high profile challenge of defamation law to the First Amendment rights. The Macrons are even ready to showcase scientific, photographic, and personal evidence to demonstrate the gender of Brigitte Macron and defend their honor. The case itself brings out the thin line between freedom of speech and responsibility in perpetrating false, harmful statements, and its resolution may have significant precedents to international defamation litigation.
Also read- The truth about french government colapse in 2025