Secret Drone hit Gaza flotilla on sept-9 , Gaza aid boat of Global Sumud Flotilla struck by fire in Tunisia- activists say it was drone strike, officials deny. International investigation was awaited.
The most recent news is up to date as of September 9, 2025:
- Another international civilian vessel, the Global Sumud Flotilla (GSF) delivering humanitarian aid to Gaza, which included activist Greta Thunberg and others, claimed its flagship, a Portuguese-flagged vessel dubbed the Family Boat, had been hit by a drone when at the Sidi Bou Said port in Tunisia. Luckily, none of the six occupants on board was injured. Fire damaged the boat on its main deck and below-deck storage. The GSF released video footage and described it as a drone strike.
- Tunisian authorities categorically rejected the accusation saying that there was no drone attack. They proposed that a life jacket could have been lit with a cigarette or lighter and that this could have started the fire.
- Political leaders such as UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese who were on the ground at the port raised their eyebrows as well as suggesting the possibility that Israel can be involved but Israel has not made any declarations on the incident.
A brief, fact-packaged summary of what the Global Sumud Flotilla is attempting to accomplish, what evidence the organisers have published, and how other international actors have responded.
1) The task of the flotilla (what and why)
- The Global Sumud Flotilla (GSF) is a non-governmental maritime convoy organised in 2025 in opposition to the Israeli naval blockade of Gaza and the provision of humanitarian relief (food, medicines and other supplies) (civilian-led). It unites dozens of ships and volunteers representing dozens of countries (including high-profile activists and elected leaders). Its organisers define it as a non violent humanitarian intervention efforts to alleviate a deteriorating crisis in Gaza.
2) What evidence the flotilla have already issued.
- Onboard/security-camera clips and social-media video. On X/Instagram and other sites, the GSF has uploaded several videos, which it claims depict a luminous flying object striking the lead vessel (Family Boat), and then an explosion, smoke and a small onboard fire, which was suppressed. Certain videos seem to be shot by a different ship nearby and others by the on-board cameras.
- What the clips depict (as reported): a momentary bright object observed at altitude, a noise bang, occupants on deck taking action/seeking safety and smoke/flames on the main deck or storage locations below deck. The organisers indicate that six occupants on board were not injured.
- Investigations and physical evidence: according to the organisers, the boat was damaged by fire to the main deck and below-deck storage; the organisers intend to release evidence in the form of a press conference. Journalists and agencies have not yet been subjected to independent verification and forensic analysis.
3) Governmental reactions and foreign reaction.
- (Authorities of Tunisia): The interior ministry and nation-guard of Tunisia have vehemently denied a drone strike – stating that there is no foundation in truth to that assertion, that there were no drones located and that a fire had evidently broken out inside of the ship (they conjectured, among other things, that a lifejacket had ignited). Tunisian investigators claim that they are investigating the incident.
- United Nations / independent on-site observer: UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese, who is with the flotilla, provided security-camera footage and advised caution but added that, were it established that it was an attack, it would amount to aggression against Tunisia and a grave violation. She demanded the rest of the boats to be safe. Her posts and remarks have been very much reported and spread.
- Other international/nongovernmental responses: the large media houses and activists have taken alarm and called out investigations; various governments and international actors are keenly monitoring and have called on calm and verification. (Israel had not issued an official response yet and no state had taken responsibility yet, when the reporting was made)
4) Open questions / what we do not know yet.
- Who, whoever, fired the gadget? Organisers are aware of a drone but do not yet have publicly accessible forensic evidence that could place the blame on a specific actor. These would need independent verification (radar logs, forensic examination of the munition or wreckage, official airspace surveillance, oath sworn testimonies).
- Official conflicting stories. Tunisian officials claim that there were no drones and suggest a potential internal explosion; the footage and witness data of the flotilla talks of an external blow. Investigators must reconcile those two lines of claim.
5) Status of coverage and the next areas of concern.
- Anticipate the press conference of the flotilla and any supporting technical data (greater-resolution video, time stamps, GPS/radar tracking, expert commentary) – which may be the next big public event. Investigation findings by the authorities and any third party forensics by the Tunisians will also be sought by the journalists.
Conclusion
The purported drone attack on the Global Sumud Flotilla Family Boat has caused a current of debate, with activists citing videotaped evidence of attack, and the Tunisian government strongly denying it, arguing it was an internal fire.
As the incident highlighted the risk of humanitarian operations in Gaza and also the underlying political tensions, the resulting questions, framed by international observers such as UN Rapporteur Francesca Albanese, include the question of the risks of humanitarian missions to Gaza and the underlying political tensions.
The world is now waiting to develop additional research, a forensic examination and the next press conference of the flotilla to shed some light on what actually actually occurred in Tunisian waters.
Also read- The truth about anti-corruption protest in nepal 2025